New Comments +/-

  • Ann: When I went into on demand the other morning the menu was blank (while video or...
  • endicott jones: George Harrison in the movie Help. That's why Tom Petty wears one, I believe. O...
  • kill: thats a fake pic u cop lovin newbs...
  • legal tailor: Available from our website at half price of everyone else, and exactly the same....
  • Tim McCarthy: I get Error Code 14 when I hit my On Demand..any idea's? It worked fine earlier....
  • tastym: I gotta tell ya rugerx's recipe is the stuff! The gringo Michelada el Pickle ha...
  • mohd: I wish God to guide you to the straight Take the United consideration of the pr...
  • mohd: In the name of God the Merciful Pray for the mother Oh God, Oh Lord and ...
  • zakia marie: http://blog.ruggedriders.com/?p=305...

Tags +/-

Archive +/-

People? +/-

Failed Projects +/-

Meta +/-

Consumer Reports

I’m soon to be in the market for a new car and was interested in signing up for Consumer Reports in order to do a little research. When I attempted to sign up online I was unimpressed by their ironically un-consumer-friendly online subscription models — they’re all auto-renew:

consumerreportsautorenew.jpg

Mandatory auto renew is a crock and certainly does not aid me as a consumer, it just gives me a chance to forget that I’ve signed up for a product that I definitely only want for one time period. I just find it ironic that Consumer Reports would take such an anti-consumer friendly position considering their general pro-consumer stance.  This is a slimy, pro-business anti-consumer move and they should be shamed for it.

I guess I’ll just get the car issue off the newsstand, ebay, or preferably from my local library.



Tags: , , ,
 

6 Responses:

  1. Troeltsch Says:

    Or you could get it at the library and deny them all of their money. Probably a good idea to let them know why you’re doing what you’re doing. CU is a big organization, but I imagine they might respond.

    [.]

  2. Bill Says:

    The marketing folks at Consumer Reports and Consumers Union have a different mindset than some of the folks there who have a more pro consumer attitude, particularly the lobbying office. In general, the business stance of CU as an organization is pro the market system, including aggressive/abusive marketing, so long as that marketing isn’t dishonest. I found this out when I tried to talk to them about annoying captive audience marketing over loudspeakers in some grocery stores. Your complaint is another example. If you do write them, don’t expect any sympathy, but it would be interesting to know how they respond.

    [.]

  3. DoorFrame Says:

    I’ll write them a letter/email today.

    [.]

  4. DoorFrame Says:

    Ok, I sent them this email. I’ll let you know if they answer.

    Hi, I am not yet a subscriber to Consumer Reports. Yesterday I began
    the process of signing up for an online account in order to research a
    new car purchase but was exceedingly disheartened to discover that all
    three online subscription options included a mandatory auto-renew
    feature at the end of the subscription term. If I sign up for a
    one-year account today, exactly one year from now I’ll suddenly
    discover that I’ve unintentionally signed up again. This is a service
    that I will definitely only want one time period for and I don’t want
    to run the high risk of forgetting to cancel my account one year from
    now.

    Mandatory auto-renew is a crock and certainly does not aid me as a
    consumer. I just find it ironic that Consumer Reports would take such
    an anti-consumer friendly position considering your general
    pro-consumer bent. This is a slimy, pro-business, anti-consumer move
    and you should be shamed for it.

    Due to your choice of auto-renew only, I have decided not to sign up
    for an online account and will instead obtain the car issue off the
    newsstand, from ebay, or _preferably_, from my local library.

    I wrote about this issue here, and would be happy to post a response
    if you’d like to offer one:

    http://www.rumorsdaily.com/2008/02/27/consumer-reports/

    [.]

  5. DoorFrame Says:

    Upon re-reading, it may be a little bit too belligerent. I should have left out ‘crock.’ Oh well.

    [.]

  6. Barzelay Says:

    I always do that: I write something vitriolic and funny that gets my point across in a forceful way, only to realize, after I sent it, that it was way too harsh and/or mean-spirited. My exposure of your identity was one such occurrence.

    But in this case, I don’t actually think you went too far at all. Although you did kinda close the door to them making you some counter-offer, i.e. free subscription for a year.

    [.]

Leave your Comment