New Comments +/-

  • Morgan: i know what ya mean henk, been stuck in my head too. its not crappy music too. r...
  • Jane: mood neck...
  • Michael Randall: Erin is pretty cool all right. Shapely, athletic, intelligent, pink hair..........
  • envy: Interesting. Thanks!...
  • nach: 36. The highest I haven't been to (unless I was a kid) is Denver. Surprising Veg...
  • Lorelei: Well, he can't really condemn the Iranian government without playing into their ...
  • Kevin: Birchy, I think the pizza you are trying to remember was made by Kraft. It wa...
  • Kevin: I got a real chuckle out of reading this thread. As a kid in the 60's and 70's b...
  • RD: Yeah, I sort of turned them off. I'm not sure if I like them or not....

Tags +/-

Archive +/-

People? +/-

Failed Projects +/-

Meta +/-

High Contrast Display

Why does Windows still include this “High Contrast” display as an option? Has anybody chosen this in the last twenty years? You literally can’t read the text.



Tags: , ,
 

3 Responses:

  1. Doobybrain Says:
    April 2nd, 2008 at 2:49 am

    haha, that’s true. i have NEVER seen anybody use that setting.

    [.]

  2. jbg. Says:
    April 2nd, 2008 at 8:47 am

    i always assumed this was for some sort of specific accessibility need YOU INSENSITIVE ASSHOLE.

    [.]

  3. Brother Jeffrey Says:
    April 3rd, 2008 at 9:40 am

    There is some sort of accessibility reason. Both my system and Mac OS X.? allow you to invert the colors with a simple keystroke. Also, if you use a particular kind of monitor (not your standard backlit LCD like you probably have), the type of which I have forgotten, it uses “less” energy because white requires turning on lights and black doesn’t.

    [.]

Leave your Comment